Platform Comparison
Hordus AI vs AIClicks
Comparing Hordus AI — the fully managed GEO/AEO platform with real behavioral data — against AIClicks for AI search visibility optimization.
The Core Difference
AIClicks focuses on click-through metrics from AI-generated results. Hordus AI measures Answer Share of Voice — how often your brand appears in AI answers — using real behavioral data from 30M+ opted-in devices, then engineers the content signals to increase those citations.
Feature Comparison: Hordus AI vs AIClicks
| Capability | Hordus AI | AIClicks |
|---|---|---|
| Data Source | ✓30M+ opted-in real devices — actual user behavioral data (GDPR/CCPA) | Simulated queries — no real user intent signal |
| AI Engine Coverage | ✓ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews (5 engines) | Limited engine coverage, primarily ChatGPT-focused |
| Answer Share of Voice (A-SOV) | ✓Real A-SOV dashboard with trend analysis across all AI engines | Click-based metrics — not true answer-level share of voice |
| AI Journey Tracing | ✓Full path from AI prompt → brand mention → conversion | Not available — no journey-level attribution |
| GEO Audit | ✓Structural and semantic gap analysis blocking AI citation | Generic content suggestions without AI-specific signals |
| Service Model | ✓Fully managed — Hordus team executes GEO strategy end-to-end | Self-serve dashboard — requires in-house team to act on data |
| API & Agent Access | ✓Full REST API, OpenAPI 3.1 spec, MCP server, webhooks | Dashboard-only; limited programmatic access |